3/14/2008 7:00 AM
By Lawrence Smith -Mason Bureau
The West Virginia Record
POINT PLEASANT - The Mason County Board of Education has been named as a co-defendant in two civil suits alleging responsibility for injuries two special needs students suffered at the hands of their teacher.
That teacher, who is named a co-defendant, has a pending suit against the Board challenging an administrative law judge's decision upholding the Board's decision terminating her for the alleged acts.
On Dec. 19, two Mason County residents, identified only as M.F. and A.C., filed separate lawsuits alleging their children, identified only as C.F. and J.C., respectively, were improperly disciplined by their New Haven Elementary preschool teacher, Katherine Parrish. According to the suits, which are identical in wording expect for the names involved, the infants suffered "physical and emotional abuse" as a result of Parrish's actions.
In their complaint and suit, filed with the assistance of Matthew L. Clark, with the Point Pleasant law firm of Kayser, Layne and Clark, the residents allege that Parrish on several occasions between August and December 2006, "placed the infant [C.F/J.C] into a body sock, which brutally restrained [C.F./J.C.] in an abusive manner inconsistent with the child's Individualized Educational Plan or any accepted teaching practice."
Also, the suits allege Parrish, "covered the infant's face and head in an unreasonable manner for an undetermined amount of time while [C.F./J.C.] was restrained in the body sock." During the time they were each restrained, eyewitnesses observed Parrish leave the room.
Likewise, eyewitnesses observed Parrish "pick up [C.F./J.C.] and slam [C.F/J.C] down on the bleachers in an abusive manner." Because of the "physical and mental abuse [C.F./J.C.] suffered at the hands of Katherine Parrish, [C.F./J.C.] frequently recalls the abusive events and becomes frightened, and utters phrases consistent with the abuse endured," the suits allege.
According to court records, Parrish's actions where not halted until Susan Howard, a teacher's aide, reported it to the Board on Dec. 14, 2006. However, Clark says the school's principal, Robert Vaughan, was alerted to this matter a week earlier, but did nothing."
Defendant, Principal Robert Vaughan's inaction allowed the emotional and physical abuse of Defendant, Katherine Parrish, to continue until the Mason County Board of Education suspended and eventually terminated the employment of Defendant, Katherine Parrish," Clark said.
Because of his alleged inaction, Vaughan is named a co-defendant in the suits.
According to court records, the Board terminated Parrish, who lives in Ripley, on Jan. 18, 2007. On July 9, the West Virginia Education and State Employees Grievance Board upheld the school board's decision.
In the suit, Clark alleges that the actions of the three defendants has resulted in the infants to incur "Physical pain and suffering; Medical bills and costs; Mental pain, Suffering and anguish; Anxiety; and Loss of ability to enjoy life."
As compensation, Clark is asking that the three defendants be held jointly and severally liable for their actions so the infants may be awarded "an amount above and beyond the jurisdictional limits of this Honorable Court with prejudgment interest at the legal rate set forth by statute, post judgment interest, costs and attorneys fees incurred in the prosecution of this action."
"Further," Clark added, "Plaintiff[s] demand judgment against Defendant Katherine Parrish, for exemplary and punitive damages in an amount to be decided by a jury, and such further relief as the Court may order just and proper."
Teacher challenging termination
Though the suit was filed in December, neither of defendants has filed a reply. However, in a separate lawsuit, Parrish has challenged her termination.
As first reported by the West Virginia Record, Parrish, with the assistance of James M. Casey and Jeremy Vickers of the Casey Law Offices in Point Pleasant, filed an appeal of the Grievance Board's decision to Mason Circuit Court on Aug. 8. Casey and Vickers challenged personal observations Denise M. Spatafore, the administrative law judge, made in her ruling as "arbitrary, capricious and characterized by abuse of discretion and clearly warranted exercise of discretion."
Other than the Board via its attorney Gregory W. Bailey with Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff and Love's Morgantown office filing a motion to dismiss on Aug. 13, and Casey and Vickers submitting the entire record of the Grievance Board's finding into the court record on Oct. 25, no new action has been taken in the case.
All three cases are before Mason Circuit Judge David W. Nibert.
Mason Circuit Court, Case Nos. 07-C-191 (M.F., as guardian and next of kin to C.F.), 07-C-192 (A.C., as guardian and next friend of J.C.) and 07-AA-119 (Parrish)
Showing posts with label Emotional Abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emotional Abuse. Show all posts
Friday, March 14, 2008
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Lawsuit: Readington school aides failed to report abuse by teacher
by Ralph R. Ortega/The Star-Ledger
Wednesday March 05, 2008, 5:41 PM
Paraprofessionals and school aides failed to report the alleged physical and emotional abuse of special needs children by a teacher at a Hunterdon County school over a two-year period, according to a lawsuit filed by parents of one of the students.
According to the lawsuit, the child was struck, grabbed, pushed, pinched, restrained, assaulted, battered and locked in a bathroom while attending a morning preschool autism class at the Readington School District during the 2004 and 2005 academic years.
The teacher accused of causing the abuse resigned after the problem was eventually reported to the administration of the Three Bridges School, according to the suit.
The suit, filed Tuesday at the Hunterdon County Courthouse in Flemington, does not detail how many children were allegedly abused. The suit claimed paraprofessionals and school aides witnessed the alleged abuse over the two-year period and failed to report it because they had not been trained on how to do so.
Readington Superintendent Jorden Schiff said a reporting system is now in place, but declined to comment specifically on the suit.
State regulations require that child abuse be reported to the Division of Youth and Family Services. Lisa Eastwood, an attorney for the parents who filed the suit, said a complaint against the teacher was made with DYFS after the alleged abuses were reported, but that finding of abuse was reversed on Friday.
The parents who filed the suit still maintain there was abuse, Eastwood said.
Read more in Thursday's Star-Ledger.
Wednesday March 05, 2008, 5:41 PM
Paraprofessionals and school aides failed to report the alleged physical and emotional abuse of special needs children by a teacher at a Hunterdon County school over a two-year period, according to a lawsuit filed by parents of one of the students.
According to the lawsuit, the child was struck, grabbed, pushed, pinched, restrained, assaulted, battered and locked in a bathroom while attending a morning preschool autism class at the Readington School District during the 2004 and 2005 academic years.
The teacher accused of causing the abuse resigned after the problem was eventually reported to the administration of the Three Bridges School, according to the suit.
The suit, filed Tuesday at the Hunterdon County Courthouse in Flemington, does not detail how many children were allegedly abused. The suit claimed paraprofessionals and school aides witnessed the alleged abuse over the two-year period and failed to report it because they had not been trained on how to do so.
Readington Superintendent Jorden Schiff said a reporting system is now in place, but declined to comment specifically on the suit.
State regulations require that child abuse be reported to the Division of Youth and Family Services. Lisa Eastwood, an attorney for the parents who filed the suit, said a complaint against the teacher was made with DYFS after the alleged abuses were reported, but that finding of abuse was reversed on Friday.
The parents who filed the suit still maintain there was abuse, Eastwood said.
Read more in Thursday's Star-Ledger.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Physical Education
When special-ed teachers seclude and restrain students, the state says no one needs to know
by Elizabeth Ulrich
Nashville Scene.com
January 24, 2008
Rob Zimmerman’s son Jack is the kind of smart, happy child who loved school. But two years ago, Jack’s dad says, that suddenly changed. When the now 11-year-old moved to another special-ed classroom at his Williamson County school, Zimmerman says Jack’s new teacher did not believe he was “as much autistic as he was ornery.”
The teacher told the family that Jack was “trying to trick her.” Jack’s behavior changed, as he began to dread school and act out—screaming and spiraling out of control.
Zimmerman and his wife were shocked to learn why: Jack’s teachers had taken him down the hall to a janitor’s closet, placed him inside and shut the door, leaving the boy to sit alone in the dark for up to three hours at a time on more than one occasion. “They said he liked it better when it was dark,” an animated Zimmerman told a group of state lawmakers Tuesday. “We’re talking about human life—my son’s life,” Zimmerman said.
And it wasn’t long before Jack told his parents that his teachers were also “umphing him,” describing the groaning sound his teachers made as they held him down for “ornery” behavior. In his own way, Jack alerted his parents to a growing problem in special-ed classrooms all over the state: the unreported, undocumented use of seclusion and restraint.
Jack’s case is rare in the sense that he was able to tell his parents he had been restrained and stuffed into a closet that his father says school employees called a “calming room.” Many autistic children are not as verbally developed as Jack and are therefore incapable of reporting abuse.
Often, these are children who, as Zimmerman puts it, are “set up for abuse.”
After reports like Zimmerman’s began to trickle in, the Disability Coalition on Education (DCE), a statewide organization of educators, advocacy groups and families, reviewed state law and found that there are no guidelines to regulate how—or if—schools should report such incidents or document how often they occur.
To push state lawmakers to draft legislation to require such oversight, representatives from several advocacy organizations for the disabled and mentally ill met Tuesday with a House-Senate study committee. They discussed the methods of restraint and seclusion now used with Tennessee special-ed students.
The committee also heard a tearful Gary Hassell talk about his son, a special-education student with autism at Oakmont Elementary in Dickson County, who had been physically restrained, face-down, on the classroom floor. School employees held his son down for an hour in what is called the “prone” position, a controversial hold that some experts say can result in asphyxia in as few as six minutes.
Similar methods of seclusion and restraint have led to the deaths of two teens at Chad Youth Enhancement Center, a residential treatment facility for troubled youth just outside of Clarksville (“Handle With Care,” Nov. 8) and have been key components in claims of abuse and neglect at Hermitage Hall, a Nashville private residential facility that treats male sex offenders (“Bad Medicine,” Dec. 13).
State records for Chad and Hermitage Hall, both of which are licensed by the state’s Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities (DMHDD), describe hundreds of cases where young residents are physically restrained, often violently, by facility staff. Neither DMHDD nor the Department of Children’s Services finds anything out of the ordinary or troubling about these incidences, according to interviews with officials there, and Gov. Phil Bredesen’s office also has been unswayed by reports of abuses at these juvenile facilities, directing questions back to the departments.
But Tennessee public schools are not required to report incidents of seclusion and restraint to the state—or even to parents such as Zimmerman. Carol Westlake, the executive director of the Tennessee Disability Coalition, told the study committee that, while state law requires in-patient facilities and residential juvenile programs to report how often such incidents occur, public schools remain one of the only places in the state without that mandate.
And, while facilities such as Chad and Hermitage Hall purport to have stringent requirements for teaching workers how to properly administer restraint holds, schools are not legally required to train employees.
DCE Chair Holly Lu Conant Rees says her organization has repeatedly requested a copy of the Metro schools’ policy on seclusion and restraint but has received nothing.
Conant Rees tells the Scene that her organization has started to collect data from parents across the state to push state lawmakers to draft legislation.
Thirty families, several of whom have students in Metro public schools, completed a DCE survey saying that their children have experienced multiple incidents of restraint and seclusion in the classroom. DCE describes the findings as “uniformly disturbing.”
Of those families reporting incidents to DCE, 40 percent said school staffers injured their children, who showed signs of bruising, contusions, abrasions and nail and grip marks. And 60 percent of families reported that their children experienced significant psychological and behavioral setbacks after being restrained or secluded. The children had acted out with violent tantrums and experienced anxiety, night terrors and psychosis.
It’s a familiar story to parents like Zimmerman, who says it only takes one encounter with a “bad apple” in the special-education classroom to change a child’s life forever. “If you don’t have documentation, you don’t have accountability.”
by Elizabeth Ulrich
Nashville Scene.com
January 24, 2008
Rob Zimmerman’s son Jack is the kind of smart, happy child who loved school. But two years ago, Jack’s dad says, that suddenly changed. When the now 11-year-old moved to another special-ed classroom at his Williamson County school, Zimmerman says Jack’s new teacher did not believe he was “as much autistic as he was ornery.”
The teacher told the family that Jack was “trying to trick her.” Jack’s behavior changed, as he began to dread school and act out—screaming and spiraling out of control.
Zimmerman and his wife were shocked to learn why: Jack’s teachers had taken him down the hall to a janitor’s closet, placed him inside and shut the door, leaving the boy to sit alone in the dark for up to three hours at a time on more than one occasion. “They said he liked it better when it was dark,” an animated Zimmerman told a group of state lawmakers Tuesday. “We’re talking about human life—my son’s life,” Zimmerman said.
And it wasn’t long before Jack told his parents that his teachers were also “umphing him,” describing the groaning sound his teachers made as they held him down for “ornery” behavior. In his own way, Jack alerted his parents to a growing problem in special-ed classrooms all over the state: the unreported, undocumented use of seclusion and restraint.
Jack’s case is rare in the sense that he was able to tell his parents he had been restrained and stuffed into a closet that his father says school employees called a “calming room.” Many autistic children are not as verbally developed as Jack and are therefore incapable of reporting abuse.
Often, these are children who, as Zimmerman puts it, are “set up for abuse.”
After reports like Zimmerman’s began to trickle in, the Disability Coalition on Education (DCE), a statewide organization of educators, advocacy groups and families, reviewed state law and found that there are no guidelines to regulate how—or if—schools should report such incidents or document how often they occur.
To push state lawmakers to draft legislation to require such oversight, representatives from several advocacy organizations for the disabled and mentally ill met Tuesday with a House-Senate study committee. They discussed the methods of restraint and seclusion now used with Tennessee special-ed students.
The committee also heard a tearful Gary Hassell talk about his son, a special-education student with autism at Oakmont Elementary in Dickson County, who had been physically restrained, face-down, on the classroom floor. School employees held his son down for an hour in what is called the “prone” position, a controversial hold that some experts say can result in asphyxia in as few as six minutes.
Similar methods of seclusion and restraint have led to the deaths of two teens at Chad Youth Enhancement Center, a residential treatment facility for troubled youth just outside of Clarksville (“Handle With Care,” Nov. 8) and have been key components in claims of abuse and neglect at Hermitage Hall, a Nashville private residential facility that treats male sex offenders (“Bad Medicine,” Dec. 13).
State records for Chad and Hermitage Hall, both of which are licensed by the state’s Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities (DMHDD), describe hundreds of cases where young residents are physically restrained, often violently, by facility staff. Neither DMHDD nor the Department of Children’s Services finds anything out of the ordinary or troubling about these incidences, according to interviews with officials there, and Gov. Phil Bredesen’s office also has been unswayed by reports of abuses at these juvenile facilities, directing questions back to the departments.
But Tennessee public schools are not required to report incidents of seclusion and restraint to the state—or even to parents such as Zimmerman. Carol Westlake, the executive director of the Tennessee Disability Coalition, told the study committee that, while state law requires in-patient facilities and residential juvenile programs to report how often such incidents occur, public schools remain one of the only places in the state without that mandate.
And, while facilities such as Chad and Hermitage Hall purport to have stringent requirements for teaching workers how to properly administer restraint holds, schools are not legally required to train employees.
DCE Chair Holly Lu Conant Rees says her organization has repeatedly requested a copy of the Metro schools’ policy on seclusion and restraint but has received nothing.
Conant Rees tells the Scene that her organization has started to collect data from parents across the state to push state lawmakers to draft legislation.
Thirty families, several of whom have students in Metro public schools, completed a DCE survey saying that their children have experienced multiple incidents of restraint and seclusion in the classroom. DCE describes the findings as “uniformly disturbing.”
Of those families reporting incidents to DCE, 40 percent said school staffers injured their children, who showed signs of bruising, contusions, abrasions and nail and grip marks. And 60 percent of families reported that their children experienced significant psychological and behavioral setbacks after being restrained or secluded. The children had acted out with violent tantrums and experienced anxiety, night terrors and psychosis.
It’s a familiar story to parents like Zimmerman, who says it only takes one encounter with a “bad apple” in the special-education classroom to change a child’s life forever. “If you don’t have documentation, you don’t have accountability.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)